Scientists Need To Urgently Review Whether New Preprint Study Warning Of Impaired Adaptive Immunity And Suppressed Innate Immunity By mRNA Shots Holds Any Truth!
In the last 48 hours, a new print study has been circulating around the online realm and causing a lot of confusion and also making a lot of people worried including individuals like myself!
Instead or simply banning or blocking the paper in question by ordering the tech sector to do so, the scientific community needs to quickly address the points raised in the study to properly dispel any viewpoints in it that could not be true by providing proper scientific evidence and if there is any segments that could be true and warrants further urgent research, the scientific community needs to address these fast.
The preprint paper in question warns that the current mRNA jabs could actually be causing the suppression of the innate immunity system and also impairing the adaptive immunity system and is causing a variety of medical and health conditions to arise, some of which can be very detrimental especially in the long term. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937
The study was led by Dr Stephanie Seneff, a credible scientific researcher with no hidden agendas and who has published more than 200 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals and conference proceedings.
Dr Seneff is a senior research scientist at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. She has a BS degree from MIT in biology and MS, EE and PhD degrees from MIT in electrical engineering and computer science.
The current mRNA jabs utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins that hides the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production.
The study findings however claim both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the mRNA shots compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2.
The study findings showed that the genetic modifications introduced by the shots are likely the source of these differential responses.
The study findings presented the evidence that these mRNA shots, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
The study findings also explained the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.
The study findings also identified potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. Alarmingly these disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.
The study team anticipates that implementation of booster shots on a wide scale will make all of these problems only more acute, and it will serve to further erode antiviral immune competence and innate cancer surveillance and protection for the global population sub
jected to these repeated boosters.
The study team also showed evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting their hypothesis.
An interesting point raised by the study comparing jab rates with COVID-19 infection rates across 68 countries and 294 counties in the United States in early September, 2021, found no correlation between the two, suggesting that these jabs do not protect from spread of the disease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
Regarding the issue that these mRNA shots can prevent symptom severity, the study team says that even this aspect is beginning to be in doubt, as demonstrated by an outbreak in an Israeli hospital that led to the death of five fully jabbed hospital patients. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34596015/
Similarly, another study reported that 34/152 (22%) of fully jabbed patients among 17 Israeli hospitals died of COVID-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8261136/
The study team warns that the increasing evidence that the shots do little to control disease spread and that their effectiveness wanes over time make it even more imperative to assess the degree to which the shots might cause harm.
GC Enrichment And Potential G4 Structures In Jab mRNAS
Some members of the same study team recently investigated the possible alterations in secondary structure of mRNAs in SARS-CoV-2 shots due to codon optimization of synthetic mRNA transcripts https://osf.io/bcsa6/
This study has shown that there is a significant enrichment of GC content in mRNAs in jabs (53% in BNT 162b2 and 61% in mRNA-1273) as compared to the native SARS-CoV-2 mRNA (36%). The enriched GC content of mRNAs is the result of codon optimization performed during the development of the mRNAs used in SARS-CoV-2 shots, apparently without determining the effect on secondary structures, particularly the G quadruplex
Codon optimization describes the production of synthetic, codon-optimized polypeptides and proteins used in biotechnology therapeutics (such as the synthetic mRNAs used for SARS-CoV-2 shots). The altered codon assignments within the mRNA template dramatically increase the quantity of polypeptides and/or proteins produced. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25263172/
Synonymous codon replacement also results in a change in the multifunctional regulatory and structural roles of resulting proteins. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/41/4/2073/2414416
For this reason, codon optimization has been cautioned against due to its consequent changes causing perturbation in the secondary conformation of protein products with potentially devastating effects on their resulting immunogenicity, efficacy and function. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23417067/
Notably, various human diseases are the result of synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-017-3609-6
These study findings have alarming implications about the possible rise of cancers and neurodegenerative diseases as a result of these mRNA shots in the future.
The study team concluded that a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA shots excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
We only touched on a few aspects of this study findings but we suggest that all individuals should read the study in detail and also the medical and scientific community need to assess these findings urgently including the mRNA shot manufacturers themselves. We are not here to start a blame game but rather find the problems fast and fix it and for those that it might be too late, too bad as they deserved it for being ignorant and listening to those controlling the COVID-19 narratives without having any brains to question!
For the latest on mRNA shots
, keep on logging to Thailand Medical News.
Read Also: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/100-questions-they-dont-want-to-answer?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web